Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cittàgazze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merged to Locations in His Dark Materials. --Tone 21:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cittàgazze

The article asserts no notability through referencing, and as such is just an in-universe plot repetition of elements of the Dark Materials books plot sections, and is thus duplicative of those sections. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 14:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to His Dark Materials. I don't think it is notable enough for its own article, but seems fine to be merged into this much broader topic. jj137 ♠ Talk 23:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge along with any other HDM locations to a new Locations in His Dark Materials article Cassandra Leo (talk) 08:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Cassandra Leo to new Locations in His Dark Materials. At present there is only Jordan College, Oxford; merging that will be a good opportunity to strip out its non-notable content. There are other locations that could be added, once the articles are converted to a single list. The list will satisfy notability, as it is sufficient that the concept i.e. "location" is notable. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to a article on the locations in general, as Faynetic suggests. The nom seems to thinks only plot significant in fiction, but I disagree--so is settings and many other things. There will be some overlap with plot elements but for some purposes an organisation this way is clearer. Personally, I think there will eventually be materials to expand it back into separate articles, but not yet. DGG (talk) 08:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball Merge in the absence of new information. --Thin boy 00 @329, i.e. 06:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.